Résumé:
By contrasting the U.S. position on Israel’s and Iran’s nuclear projects, this study investigates the
double standard in the country's non-proliferation policy. Finding the underlying reasons for these
disparate strategies and their effects on regional and global dynamics is the goal. Israel, which is
generally suspected of having nuclear weapons but is not a party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty
(NPT), enjoys strong U.S. support and minimal criticism, whereas Iran, a signatory to the NPT, is
subject to harsh sanctions and international pressure. This discrepancy calls into question the real
forces behind US policy. The study uses a qualitative comparative approach and pulls from
academic research, official papers, and reports from international agencies, as well as policy
statements, historical records, and geopolitical analyses. Findings suggest that historical alliances,
strategic interests, and domestic politics play a decisive role in shaping U.S. non-proliferation
efforts. The U.S.-Israel alliance and concerns over Iran’s regional influence heavily influence
policy direction. Ultimately, this double standard undermines global non-proliferation goals,
heightens regional tensions, and erodes trust in U.S. leadership.
